<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;You had me at Apex&#8221;&#8230; Well, almost.</title>
	<link>http://sfdc-heretic.warped-minds.com/2006/10/09/you-had-me-at-apex-well-almost/</link>
	<description>The Salesforce Heretic - Pushing the limits of On-Demand CRM</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: heretic</title>
		<link>http://sfdc-heretic.warped-minds.com/2006/10/09/you-had-me-at-apex-well-almost/#comment-2551</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sfdc-heretic.warped-minds.com/2006/10/09/you-had-me-at-apex-well-almost/#comment-2551</guid>
					<description>Simon: I couldn't agree with you more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simon: I couldn&#8217;t agree with you more.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mike Leach</title>
		<link>http://sfdc-heretic.warped-minds.com/2006/10/09/you-had-me-at-apex-well-almost/#comment-2550</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 03:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sfdc-heretic.warped-minds.com/2006/10/09/you-had-me-at-apex-well-almost/#comment-2550</guid>
					<description>I have to say I'm very impressed with Apex. Every database needs a stored proc language and this was seriously lacking in Salesforce... until now.

It's important to note that this only is a Data Access language, *not* a UI language. You need the AJAX toolkit to create complete solutions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say I&#8217;m very impressed with Apex. Every database needs a stored proc language and this was seriously lacking in Salesforce&#8230; until now.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s important to note that this only is a Data Access language, *not* a UI language. You need the AJAX toolkit to create complete solutions.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Simon Fell</title>
		<link>http://sfdc-heretic.warped-minds.com/2006/10/09/you-had-me-at-apex-well-almost/#comment-2546</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 15:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sfdc-heretic.warped-minds.com/2006/10/09/you-had-me-at-apex-well-almost/#comment-2546</guid>
					<description>In some ways its a pity that the hype around the Apex announcement has overshadowed all the good stuff that will be in Winter '07.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In some ways its a pity that the hype around the Apex announcement has overshadowed all the good stuff that will be in Winter &#8216;07.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sinclair Schuller</title>
		<link>http://sfdc-heretic.warped-minds.com/2006/10/09/you-had-me-at-apex-well-almost/#comment-2545</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sfdc-heretic.warped-minds.com/2006/10/09/you-had-me-at-apex-well-almost/#comment-2545</guid>
					<description>Ha! It seems like I'm not the only one questioning why a new "language" and stack was introduced. I wrote about it in my recent post &lt;a href="http://www.saasblogs.com/2006/10/10/salesforcecoms-apex-benioffs-handcuffs-for-on-demand" rel="nofollow"&gt;Salesforce.com’s Apex: Benioff’s Handcuffs for On Demand&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha! It seems like I&#8217;m not the only one questioning why a new &#8220;language&#8221; and stack was introduced. I wrote about it in my recent post <a href="http://www.saasblogs.com/2006/10/10/salesforcecoms-apex-benioffs-handcuffs-for-on-demand" rel="nofollow">Salesforce.com’s Apex: Benioff’s Handcuffs for On Demand</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mike Schinkel</title>
		<link>http://sfdc-heretic.warped-minds.com/2006/10/09/you-had-me-at-apex-well-almost/#comment-2542</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 07:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sfdc-heretic.warped-minds.com/2006/10/09/you-had-me-at-apex-well-almost/#comment-2542</guid>
					<description>&#62;&#62; Why we need another full-blown language aside — couldn’t we just have used Java?

Exactly my thoughts! See: &lt;a title="Saleforce.com: Why APEX, and why not Java, C#, VB.NET, PHP, Ruby, etc. etc.?" href="http://www.thoughtsonsalesforce.com/2006/10/why_apex_and_wh.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Saleforce.com: Why APEX, and why not Java, C#, VB.NET, PHP, Ruby, etc. etc.?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt; Why we need another full-blown language aside — couldn’t we just have used Java?</p>
<p>Exactly my thoughts! See: <a title="Saleforce.com: Why APEX, and why not Java, C#, VB.NET, PHP, Ruby, etc. etc.?" href="http://www.thoughtsonsalesforce.com/2006/10/why_apex_and_wh.html" rel="nofollow">Saleforce.com: Why APEX, and why not Java, C#, VB.NET, PHP, Ruby, etc. etc.?</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: jeremy</title>
		<link>http://sfdc-heretic.warped-minds.com/2006/10/09/you-had-me-at-apex-well-almost/#comment-2538</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 00:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sfdc-heretic.warped-minds.com/2006/10/09/you-had-me-at-apex-well-almost/#comment-2538</guid>
					<description>The apex announcement is ultimately disappointing.  While the feature sounds quite useful, we *may* get to test it in a few months and there is no date set for release?  Really?  So vaporware is the best thing that they can come up with for dreamforce?  It's starting to get thick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The apex announcement is ultimately disappointing.  While the feature sounds quite useful, we *may* get to test it in a few months and there is no date set for release?  Really?  So vaporware is the best thing that they can come up with for dreamforce?  It&#8217;s starting to get thick.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
